It was late Q2 2024. I was still reconciling our Q1 spending on electrical components, trying to figure out why our sensor orders had jumped 12% from the previous quarter. Then the engineering manager walked in with a request: training for two new technicians on Mitsubishi PLC controllers.
"We need them up to speed on the FX5U," he said. "They've got some background, but nothing specific to Mitsubishi." I nodded, made a note, and told him I'd look into it. Standard procurement stuff—or so I thought.
Over the next three weeks, I realized I knew next to nothing about the true cost structure behind industrial automation training. What looked like a simple "find a class, pay for it" process turned into a much deeper evaluation. And I almost made a $4,200 mistake because I didn't ask the right questions early enough.
My first instinct was to Google, naturally. I typed in "mitsubishi electric plc training" and started scanning. Pages of results came back: official Mitsubishi courses, third-party training centers, online self-paced modules, YouTube tutorials. The range was overwhelming.
I narrowed it down to three options:
On the surface, Option B looked like the obvious winner. At $2,400 total (3 seats × $800), it was less than half of Option A. Easy choice, right?
I almost clicked 'approve' on that invoice. Glad I didn't.
I have a habit—developed over six years of tracking every procurement order in our ERP—of building a simple Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) spreadsheet for anything over $2,000. It's saved us more times than I can count. For this, I listed:
Here's what I found when I dug deeper into Options B and C:
The online training was all self-paced. No instructor, no real-time Q&A. The curriculum covered the FX series basics, but when I asked about troubleshooting specific Mitsubishi PLC communication protocols (like Modbus RTU for the FX5U), the sales rep couldn't give me a straight answer. "The modules are comprehensive," they said. Not reassuring.
Worse, there was no hands-on component. For a technician learning to wire and test an electric transfer switch controlled by a Mitsubishi PLC, reading a PDF is not the same as touching the hardware. I've seen what happens when operators learn theory only—mistakes on the floor cost us real money. A $1,200 wiring error during a rush order was fresh in my memory.
The distributor bundle looked great on paper: in-person training plus six months of remote support. But when I read the fine print—or rather, the terms document that came after I asked for it—I noticed the remote support was limited to two 1-hour sessions per month. After that, it was $150/hour.
I called a colleague at another manufacturing plant who'd used a similar package. "The Q&A sessions fill up fast," he said. "We ended up burning through our quota in the first month and paid another $900 over three months." There's the hidden cost.
I flew out to the Mitsubishi training center—yes, it meant a $380 flight and two nights at a hotel near the facility. But here's what the sticker price didn't tell me:
When I calculated the TCO for all three options, Option A came out at $4,300 per person (training + travel + time). Option B was $2,850 per person (training + time + lack of hands-on leading to mistakes). Option C was $3,500 per person (training + support + overage fees).
Option A wasn't the cheapest. It was the most honest.
Now, I don't want to sound like I'm recommending every company fly their technicians to a physical training center. That would be irresponsible. Here's where I'd tell you to consider alternatives:
But if you're in a hurry to get a technician up to speed on a new Mitsubishi PLC model, and if mistakes on the floor cost you more than the training itself, the in-person option pays for itself. In our case, one of those technicians identified a programming error in our electric transfer switch logic within two weeks of returning. That fix alone saved us about $3,500 in potential downtime.
Never expected the "expensive" option to save us money. Turns out, the network effect is real: the training center introduced our team to another company doing similar industrial automation. They ended up swapping tips on how to test ignition control module with multimeter diagnostics on a Mitsubishi-integrated system. That kind of value doesn't show up in any spreadsheet.
If I could go back and tell my Q2 2024 self one thing, it would be this: don't shortlist based on sticker price alone. Build your TCO spreadsheet, call a reference who's actually taken the course, and ask about post-training support—especially for technicalities like PLC communication setup or hardware integration.
And if you're looking at a manual generator transfer switch project that involves a Mitsubishi PLC, make sure whoever trains your team has actually worked with one. There's a difference between reading about it and having the confidence to wire it yourself.
That $4,200 I almost spent on Option B would've been wasted. The $8,600 I did spend on Option A for two people? Best procurement decision I made that year.